mirror of
https://github.com/fergalmoran/ladybird.git
synced 2025-12-22 09:19:03 +00:00
7a104fef66
If a & simple selector is on a style rule with no parent style rule, then it behaves like :scope - but notably, :scope provides 1 specificity in the class category, but & is supposed to provide 0. To solve this, we stop replacing it directly, and just handle the & like any other simple selector. We know that if the selector engine ever sees one, it's equivalent to :scope, because the nested ones will have been replaced with :is() before that point. This gets us one more subtest pass. :^)