Question: Older template with webpack vs newer template with angular-cli #78

New Issue

fergalmoran · 2025-08-09T17:14:55Z

fergalmoran commented

2025-08-09 17:14:55 +00:00

Originally created by @Vx2gas on 5/1/2018

@SteveSandersonMS I would love some direction and feedback on the templating. It was first here and the one published currently that used the webpack middleware, and has a webpack.config.js and the webpack vendor files.

However, it seems there is a newer one https://github.com/aspnet/templating/tree/dev/src/Microsoft.DotNet.Web.Spa.ProjectTemplates/content/Angular-CSharp that uses the angular-cli.

Going forward, what are the pros and cons of using the angular-cli middleware template vs the webpack middleware template?

Thanks! and btw.. looking good on Blazor!

*Originally created by @Vx2gas on 5/1/2018* @SteveSandersonMS I would love some direction and feedback on the templating. It was first here and the one published currently that used the webpack middleware, and has a webpack.config.js and the webpack vendor files. However, it seems there is a newer one [https://github.com/aspnet/templating/tree/dev/src/Microsoft.DotNet.Web.Spa.ProjectTemplates/content/Angular-CSharp](url) that uses the angular-cli. Going forward, what are the pros and cons of using the angular-cli middleware template vs the webpack middleware template? Thanks! and btw.. looking good on Blazor!

fergalmoran closed this issue

2025-08-09 17:14:55 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github/JavaScriptServices#78