mirror of
https://github.com/fergalmoran/ladybird.git
synced 2025-12-22 09:19:03 +00:00
Meta: Add policy on AI/LLM usage for changes and reviews
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Sam Atkins
parent
624b4689ac
commit
f57c6a4328
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Nobody is perfect, and sometimes we mess things up. That said, here are some goo
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Submit code that's incompatible with the project licence (2-clause BSD.)
|
||||
* Submit changes that are incompatible with the project licence (2-clause BSD.)
|
||||
* Touch anything outside the stated scope of the PR.
|
||||
* Iterate excessively on your design across multiple commits.
|
||||
* Use weasel-words like "refactor" or "fix" to avoid explaining what's being changed.
|
||||
@@ -97,6 +97,15 @@ Nobody is perfect, and sometimes we mess things up. That said, here are some goo
|
||||
* Engage in excessive "feng shui programming" by moving code around without quantifiable benefit.
|
||||
* Add jokes or other "funny" things to user-facing parts of the system.
|
||||
|
||||
## On usage of AI and LLMs
|
||||
|
||||
Usage of AI assistance is usually fine, but you are responsible for making sure the quality of the output is up to the
|
||||
standards of the project. Currently, AI-generated output is often too verbose and its quality is subpar compared to what
|
||||
most human contributors produce.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not use an AI or LLM to generate changes, respond to issues or interact with PRs without holding the output to the
|
||||
same standards as human-written content.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pull Request Q&A
|
||||
|
||||
### I've submitted a PR and it passes CI. When can I expect to get some review feedback?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user